Effect of Azimuthal Variability in Estimation of HVSR Parameters and Ground Shear Strain at Kota Baru, South Lampung, Indonesia

  • Vico Luthfi Ipmawan Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jalan Terusan Ryacudu, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia.
  • Rizqi Prastowo Mining Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta, 55382, Indonesia.
  • Mochamad Iqbal Geological Research Group, Geological Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Way Huwi, South Lampung, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia.
  • Ikah Ning Prasetiowati Permanasari Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jalan Terusan Ryacudu, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia.
  • Sofiana Herman Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jalan Terusan Ryacudu, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia.
Keywords: amplifications, dominant frequency, fault, megathrust earthquake, soft layer

Abstract

Kota Baru, a potential capital of Lampung Province in South Lampung, Indonesia, faces significant earthquake risks due to the Great Sumatran Fault and the Sumatra Megathrust. Geologically, the area is part of the Plio-Pleistocene Lampung Formation, predominantly composed of rhyolite-dacite tuff and volcanoclastic tuff, which can amplify seismic shaking. This study investigates azimuthal variations in the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) across 15 locations in Kota Baru to identify their underlying causes. The results show notable changes in peak amplitude (Ao) and dominant frequency (fo) across different azimuths, with Mean Absolute Deviations (MAD) ranging from 0.96 to 5.71 for Ao and from 0.00 to 1.57 for fo. Maximum HVSR values were predominantly observed at azimuths below 30° across most regions. These variations are likely related to differences in soft layer thickness and/or the presence of a suspected fault near the study area, both of which could influence seismic wave propagation. A model of an 8.9-magnitude megathrust earthquake revealed no significant differences in Ground Shear Strain values, with results remaining within the same Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale. Therefore, despite azimuthal variability, the assumption of isotropic ambient noise in Kota Baru remains valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. Juantara, D. Purba, I. Bulan, and D. Habsary, “Piil Pesenggiri as Cultural Values and Urban Planning in Kota Baru Lampung Province: Opportunities and Challenges:,” presented at the 2nd International Indonesia Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies (IICIS 2021), Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, 2021. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211206.009.
[2] P. Supendi et al., “On the potential for megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis off the southern coast of West Java and southeast Sumatra, Indonesia,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 1315–1328, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05696-y.
[3] S. A. Mangga, Amirudin, T. Suwarti, S. Gafoer, and Sidarto, “Peta Geologi Lembar Tanjungkarang, Sumatera skala 1:250.000,” Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi, Bandung, 1993.
[4] C. Lachetl and P.-Y. Bard, “Numerical and Theoretical Investigations on the Possibilities and Limitations of Nakamura’s Technique,” J. Phys. Earth, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 377–397, 1994, doi: 10.4294/jpe1952.42.377.
[5] V. L. Ipmawan, I. N. P. Permanasari, and R. N. Siregar, “Spatial Analysis of Seismic Hazard Based on Dynamical Characteristics of Soil in Kota Baru, South Lampung,” J. Sci. Appl. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.35472/281437.
[6] N. Haerudin, R. Rustadi, H. Fitriawan, D. Siska, and M. Farid, “Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Mapping By Modeling of Land Layer and Site Effect Zone in The Kota Baru of South Lampung,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 53–67, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i1.3705.
[7] V. L. Ipmawan, I. N. P. Permanasari, and R. N. Siregar, “Determining Soft Layer Thickness Using Ambient Seismic Noise Record Analysis in Kota Baru, South Lampung,” Makara J. Sci., vol.23,no.1,pp.39–43,Mar.2019, doi: 10.7454/mss.v23i1.10802.
[8] R. Prastowo, V. L. Ipmawan, A. Zamroni, R. Umam, I. N. P. Permanasari, and R. N. Siregar, “Identification of ground motion prone areas triggering earthquakes based on microtremor data in Jati Agung district, South Lampung Regency, Lampung, Indonesia,” presented at the 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EARTH SCIENCE, MINERAL, AND ENERGY, Yogyakarta,Indonesia,2020, p. 070003. doi: 10.1063/5.0012081.
[9] T. Cheng, B. R. Cox, J. P. Vantassel, and L. Manuel, “A statistical approach to account for azimuthal variability in single-station HVSR measurements,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 1040–1053, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaa342.
[10] M. Nogoshi and T. Igarashi, “On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor (Part 2),” Zisin J Seism. Soc Jpn. 2nd Ser, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 26–40, 1971.
[11] Y. Nakamura, “A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of surface using microtremor on the ground surface,” Railw. Tech Res Inst Quart Rep, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 1989.
[12] S. Matsushima, T. Hirokawa, F. De Martin, H. Kawase, and F. J. Sanchez-Sesma, “The Effect of Lateral Heterogeneity on Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio of Microtremors Inferred from Observation and Synthetics,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 381–393, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1785/0120120321.
[13] J. Vantassel, B. Cox, L. Wotherspoon, and A. Stolte, “Mapping Depth to Bedrock, Shear Stiffness, and Fundamental Site Period at CentrePort, Wellington, Using Surface‐Wave Methods: Implications for Local Seismic Site Amplification,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 108, no. 3B, pp. 1709–1721, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1785/0120170287.
[14] F. J. Chávez-García, M. V. Manakou, F. Hollender, and D. G. Raptakis, “Site effects using methods based on lateral homogeneity and laterally heterogeneous media: An impossible marriage?,” Bull. Earthq. Eng., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2729–2756, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0296-2.
[15] Y. Nakamura, “Seismic Vulnerability Indices for Ground And Structures Using Microtremor,” World Congr. Railw. Res. Florence, 1997.
[16] Y. Fukushima and T. Tanaka, “A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 757–783, Aug. 1990, doi: 10.1785/BSSA0800040757.
[17] K. Ishihara, “Evaluatian of Soil Properties for Use in Earthquake Response Analysis,” in Geomechanical Modelling in Engineering Practice, 1986, pp. 241–275.
Published
2025-04-19