FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI PREFERENSI TINGGAL DI RUSUNAWA TRIHARJO KABUPATEN KULON PROGO
Abstract
Addressing the housing needs of low-income communities in the Kulon Progo Regency, the local government has developed three low-cost rented apartments (rusunawa), one of which is Rusunawa Triharjo. However, field observations have indicated that the occupancy rate in Rusunawa Triharjo is below 50%. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the factors contributing to the low preference for living in Rusunawa Triharjo. The study employed a quantitative descriptive method with a scoring analysis technique. Data was collected through field observations and questionnaires distributed to 45 families using a simple random sampling technique. The analysis revealed three main factors contributing to the low preference for living in Rusunawa Triharjo, namely the availability of public spaces, building quality, and the social activities available to residents. The local government should not only focus on providing affordable rusunawa in terms of location and rental price but also considering the quality and sustainable living for residents both economically and socially.
Downloads
References
Arifien, M., & Mulianingsih, F. (2018). Pola Interaksi Sosial Penghuni Rumah Susun Bandarharjo Sebagai Wujud Konservasi Sosial. Harmony, 3(1), 91–96.
Arini, S., Soedwiwahjono, & Widodo, C. E. (2024). Faktor yang mempengaruhi preferensi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah (MBR) terhadap Rusunawa Gulon, Magelang. REGION: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 19(2), 600–625. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v19i2.83636
Arvianto, N. M. D., & Daryono. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kurang Diminatinya Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa Tanah Merah I dan Tanah Merah II Kelurahan Tanah Kalikedinding Kecamatan Kenjeran Kota Surabaya. Swara Bhumi, 1(1), 1–10.
Bagaskoro, A. (2025). Pengelolaan Rusunawa di Kulon Progo Boncos Akibat Minim Penghuni. https://radarjogja.jawapos.com/kulonprogo/656026083/pengelolaan-rusunawa-di-kulon-progo-boncos-akibat-minim-penghuni?page=3
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2023). The Household Cost of Transportation: Is it Affordable? https://www.bts.gov/data-spotlight/household-cost-transportation-it-affordable
Dewi, I. F., Anggraini, S. P., & Lestari, T. A. (2021). Peran Ruang Komunal Dilihat Dari Aktivitas Sosial di Hunian Vertikal Studi Kasus: Rusunawa Bayem Kabupaten Purworejo. Seminar Karya & Pameran Arsitektur Indonesia 2021 in Collaboration with Laboratory of Form and Place Making, 221–229. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/43492/PROSIDING SAKAPARI 7_20.pdf?sequence=1
Dewi, Z. L., & Yuliastuti, N. (2015). Pemanfaatan Ruang Bersama di Rusunawa Kaligawe, emanfaatan Ruang Bersama di Rusunawa Kaligawe, Semarang. Ruang, 1(4), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.1.4.181-190
Dompak, T., & Salsabila, L. (2024). The Development of Rusunawa Triharjo: How Effective is it in Reducing Slum Settlements? EScience Humanity Journal, 4(2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v4i2.80
Ernawati, R. (2019). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Tinggal pada Rusunawa di Kota Surabaya. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture, 5(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v5i1.527
Imamah, F., Roesmanto, T., & Harsritanto, B. I. R. (2022). Rumah Susun di Semarang Berbasis Universal Design. Jurnal Poster Pirata Syandana, 3(2). https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpps/article/view/14966
Irfiyanti, Z., & Widjonarko. (2014). Penyediaan Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa Ditinjau Dari Preferensi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah di Kabupaten Kudus. Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 3(4), 626–636. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/6685
Kementerian Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman Republik Indonesia. (2025). Wamen Fahri Tekankan Pentingnya Rusunawa untuk Atasi Hunian di Perkotaan. https://pkp.go.id/berita/detail/wamen-fahri-tekankan-pentingnya-rusunawa-untuk-atasi-hunian-di-perkotaan
Kuntadi. (2014). Rusunawa Wates Diminati Masyarakat. https://ekbis.sindonews.com/berita/896447/34/rusunawa-wates-diminati-masyarakat
Kusumaningsih, S., Astuti, W., & Fitria Rini, E. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Preferensi Masyarakat Terhadap Rusunawa Brujul. Desa-Kota, 1(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v1i1.13684.14-23
Manaf, A., Ginting, L. P., & Irwansyah, M. (2023). The Relevance of Vertical Housing to the Socio-Economic Characteristics of Occupants in Semarang City, Indonesia: Particularly the Proximity of Public Facility Aspects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1264(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1264/1/012042
Murcia, J. V. B., & Matillano, L. M. (2022). Clients’ Preference for Low-Cost Residential Properties: a Conjoint Analysis. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 7(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v7i4.1387
Prayitno, B., Prakoso, A. A., Hantono, D., Butudoka, Z., & Yulisaksono, D. (2021). Aspek Ruang Publik pada Ruang Ekonomi Informal Rusunawa di Surabaya. Jurnal IDEALOG Ide Dan Dialog Indonesia, 6(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.25124/idealog.v6i1.3897
Rahmawati, A., & Hardi, J. (2017). Evaluasi Area Komersial Lantai Dasar pada Rusunawa Marunda. Vitruvian Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan, & Lingkungan, 7(1), 47–54. https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/virtuvian/article/view/2721
Ramadhan, J., & Manaf, A. (2017). Preferensi Penghuni Terhadap Lingkungan Tempat Tinggal di Rusunawa Marunda, Kecamatan Cilincing Jakarta Utara. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 13(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v13i4.18262
Rumimper, J. (2018). Hubungan Kecenderungan Tinggal Dengan Kecukupan Hunian, Kepuasan Dan Kemampuan Penghuni Rusuna (Studi Kasus Rusuna Tambora). Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 1(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.1466
Sekretariat DPRD Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2023). Naskah Akademik Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kulon Progo tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman. Sekretariat DPRD Kabupaten Kulon Progo. https://jdih.dprd-kulonprogokab.go.id/peraturan/naskah_akademik/NASKAH_AKADEMIK_PENYELENGGARAAN_PERUMAHAN_2023.pdf
Suteja, M. S., Ratnaningrum, D., & Anggraini, D. (2018). Evaluasi Ruang Publik Sebagai Ruang Sosial yang Ramah Anak pada Peremajaan Rusunawa Tambora. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran, Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 2(2), 469–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v2i2.1738
Tehupeiory, A., Mulyana, R., Masni, I., Sianipar, J., Wayan, I., Suryawan, K., Yenis, I., & Prayogo, W. (2023). The environmental challenges of urban living: Why willingness to pay for apartments matters. Environmental Challenges, 13(April), 100766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100766
Tisnawati, E., Suparno, & Ellyanando, A. U. N. R. (2024). Sustainable Vertical Housing Based on Social & Cultural Activities. International Journal of Engineering, Technology and Natural Sciences, 6(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.46923/ijets.v6i1.348
Torres, I., Greene, M., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2013). Valuation of housing and neighbourhood attributes for city centre location: A case study in Santiago. Habitat International, 39, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.007
Triyuliana, V., & Prakoso, S. (2020). Live-work housing concept for rusunawa in indonesia: Is it possible? Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.2.2
Turner, J. F. . (1976). Housing by People: Towards autonomy in building environments. Marios Boyars.
Ukoha, O. M., & Beamish, J. O. (1997). Assessment of residents’ satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria. Habitat International, 21(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00017-9
Wiryanti, K. D., & Rudiarto, I. (2015). Evaluasi Rumah Susun Pekunden Berdasarkan Kaidah Layak Huni dan Berkelanjutan. Ruang, 1(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.1.4.231-240
Yuen, B., Yeh, A., Appold, S. J., Earl, G., Ting, J., & Kwee, L. K. (2006). High-rise living in Singapore public housing. Urban Studies, 43(3), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500533133



