Reliability Analysis of Complex Systems: An Improved Risk Importance Measure Approach

  • Ekhlas Annon Mousa Department of Mathematics, Ministry of Education, Babylon, Iraq
  • Ahmed Hasan Alridha Department of Mathematics, Ministry of Education, Babylon, Iraq
Keywords: Complex system, risk achievement worth measure, NetworkX library, Birnbaum measure

Abstract

This paper develops a new feature of the risk achievement worth (RAW) measure  to expand its application to complex transportation directed networks, rather than being limited to traditional or undirected networks. The idea is to combine the RAW measure with modern techniques using the NetworkX library in Python, to improve its computational capabilities and handle complex directed networks efficiently. The approach was applied to a complex system . We calculated its reliability using a polynomial approach based on minimal paths and minimal cut sets, in addition to calculating the probability of path success and the probability of failure for cut sets. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the risk achievement worth measure, it was compared with the Birnbaum measures for analyzing the importance of network components at a default value of R = 0.60. The results showed complete consistency in terms of the importance levels of both measures, as confirmed by the Spearman correlation coefficient, with a value . Developing the risk achievement worth for analyzing complex networks is crucial to overcoming the computational complexity of the Birnbaum measure, which relies on differentials, unlike the RAW measure, which relies on simplified arithmetic procedures independent of differentials. Therefore, this provides an enables rapid identification of critical vulnerabilities in large-scale infrastructures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Wang, “Application of graph theory in power system stability analysis*,” in 2025 4th International Conference on Electronic Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control (EEEAC), 2025, pp. 390–394.

K. de Leeuw, E. F. Moore, C. E. Shannon, and N. Shapiro, “Computability by Probabilistic Machines,” in Automata Studies. (AM-34), C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy, Eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956, pp. 183–212.

J. C. Hudson and K. C. Kapur, “Reliability theory for multistate systems with multistate components. Microelectronics Reliability,” vol. 22, pp. 1–7, 1982.

A.-C. Beiu, R.-M. Beiu, and V. Beiu, “Optimal design of linear consecutive systems,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication, 2022, vol. 2, pp. 1–2.

N.-C. Rohatinovici, O. Prostean, and V. E. Balas, “On reliability of 3D hammock networks,” in 2018 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), 2018.

E. L. Johnson, “Networks and basic solutions,” Oper. Res., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 619–623, 1966.

M. T. Kyi and L. L. Naing, “Application of ford-Fulkerson algorithm to maximum flow in water distribution pipeline network,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. (IJSRP), vol. 8, no. 12, 2018.

Y. M. Omar and P. Plapper, “Maximum flow of complex manufacturing networks,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 86, pp. 245–250, 2019.

G. Babeniuk, “MAXIMUM FLOW PROBLEM IN DELAY TOLERANT NETWORKING,” Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, pp. 41–42, 2021.

P. Miziua and J. Navarro, “Birnbaum Importance Measure for Reliability Systems With Dependent Components,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 68, pp. 439–450, 2019.

S. Si, M. Liu, Z. Jiang, T. Jin, and Z. Cai, “System reliability allocation and optimization based on generalized Birnbaum importance measure,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 831–843, 2019.

A. B. Huseby, M. Kalinowska, and T. Abrahamsen, “Birnbaum criticality and importance measures for multistate systems with repairable components,” Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 66–86, 2022.

V. M. Chacko, “On Birnbaum type joint importance measures for multistate reliability systems,” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2799–2818, 2023.

M. E. Mor-Barak and D. A. Cherin, “A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity: Exploring a measure of inclusion-exclusion,” Administration in social work, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 1998.

K. S. Trivedi, “A survey of efficient reliability computation using disjoint products approach,” Networks, 1995.

L. T. Ostrom and C. A. Wilhelmsen, Risk assessment: tools, techniques, and their applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

W. E. Vesely and T. C. Davis, “Two measures of risk importance and their application,” Nuclear technology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 226–234, 1985.

V. Korovushkin, S. Boichenko, A. Artyukhov, K. Ćwik, D. Wróblewska, and G. Jankowski, “Modern optimization technologies in hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: A systematic review of research gaps and prospects for decisions,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 17, p. 4727, 2025.

Q. Zhang, K. Li, G. Zhang, H. Zhu, and W. He, “A complex system health state assessment method with reference value optimization for interpretable BRB,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2334, 2024.

R. K. Abdullah and Z. Al-Khafaji, “An enhanced strategy for computing minimum path and cut sets to improve complex network reliability,” Babylonian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2025, pp. 12–17, 2025.

“Optimization of complex system reliability using hybrid Grey Wolf optimizer,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 2021.

Y. Zhang, B. Cai, C. Gao, Y. Zhao, X. Shao, and C. Yang, “A system-centred predictive maintenance re-optimization method based on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 274, no. 127034, p. 127034, 2025.

Published
2026-04-30